ABSTRACT
Objective:
To investigate the prevalence of voiding dysfunction (VD) and nocturnal enuresis (NE) in Turkish primary school children using a previously validated Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System (DVSS) questionnaire and a self-administered questionnaire.
Materials and Methods:
The previously validated DVSS questionnaire was completed by the parents of 3015 randomly selected children. Another questionnaire was also administered for studying VD and NE rates, demographic characteristics, and learning or behavioral problems of children.
Conclusion:
VD and NE are highly frequent in early childhood and positively correlated with children’s learning disabilities and psychological problems.
Results:
Of all children, 6.6% (n=199) had a score suggesting VD and 6.1% (n=185) had NE. No significant differences were found between children with and without VD in terms of age, gender, and fluid intake. Children with VD had significantly high rates of constipation (19.7% vs 5.2%; p<0.001) and fecal soiling (32.1% vs 5.1%; p<0.01) compared with children without VD. Children with a higher DVSS score had more frequent behavioral or psychological problems (20.7% vs 4.7%; p<0.01) and learning disabilities (14.7% vs 5.5%; p<0.01). VD had no correlation with overall maternal education level and the type of school (government or private).
What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Voiding dysfunction is a common problem in children which may affect families and children in terms of psychology, behaviour and financial burdens. There is no data about the prevalence of voiding dysfunction in many cities of our country. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of voiding dysfunction as well as related factors among primary school children in Karaman city using a validated dysfunctional voiding scoring system.
Introduction
Voiding dysfunction (VD) is a common cause for referral to urologists, pediatricians, and pediatric nephrologists. VD may present as urinary incontinence (UI), urinary tract infection (UTI), vesicoureteral reflux, overactive bladder, or constipation.
Nocturnal enuresis (NE), which is UI at night, affects both children’s and parents’ social and behavioral attitudes (1). Several classifications have been proposed according to clinical presentations of incontinence symptoms (2,3). Some classification systems are based on clinical presentations, whereas some on urodynamic parameters (2,4). NE is classified as monosymptomatic and non‑monosymptomatic. Monosymptomatic NE is UI only at night and without any VD (5). As VD, NE is commonly seen and daytime lower urinary tract symptoms are frequent in children between 5 and 7 years of age; most of whom are primary school children (6).
The prevalence of NE usually varies by region and country. In Turkiye, the prevalence has been reported to be 9-16% (7,8,9,10). Detection and treatment of NE is of importance due to the high prevalence and the resulting effects on families and children in terms of psychological and behavioral aspects, as well as associated financial burdens.
Distinguishing between monosymptomatic NE and daytime UI as a medical conditions is essential for successful and appropriate treatment (2,3,4). The diagnosis of VD mainly depends on an accurate medical history reported by parents, physical examinations, and urine analysis (3,11). Questionnaires, as a non-invasive method, are useful for diagnosis and in treatment planning and follow-up for VD (3). For an objective diagnosis and treatment follow-up, the Dysfunctional Voiding Scoring System (DVSS), first reported by Farhat et al. (12), provides an exact quantitative tool. Akbal et al. (3) developed and validated the DVSS questionnaire, modified from van Gool et al. (13), for Turkish children. This validated version is commonly used for assessing VD. The use of the DVSS questionnaire in routine clinical practice has risen in recent years (14). In addition to our study, the DVSS questionnaire has been used in some epidemiological studies of Turkish children for detecting the prevalence of VD and UI (15,16).
We investigated the prevalence of VD in children by using the DVSS questionnaire, the associated factors affecting VD, and the prevalence of NE. The sample was drawn from primary school children living in a city in the central Anatolian region of Turkiye.
Materials and Methods
This was a random‑selection based cross-sectional study involving 21 primary schools from March 2012 to May 2012 and employing a self-administered questionnaire and the DVSS questionnaire (Figure 1) (3). The children and parents were not informed about normal voiding and VD before completing the questionnaires. Parental consent and permission from the City Directorate of National Education and National Health were obtained. The DVSS questionnaire was administered to 4.477 parents, whose children were between 7 and 14 years of age. The questionnaires were completed particularly by the mothers and gathered after two weeks.
The first part of the questionnaire included demographic information, including questions on age, gender, school type (government or private), parents’ education, family income, number of siblings, any incidence of NE, voiding habits, constipation, fluid intake, and any learning or behavioral problems. The second part was the DVSS questionnaire developed for Turkish children. A score of ≥9 indicated the presence of VD (3).
Statistical Analysis
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 15.0, for Windows operating system was used to perform statistical analysis. Mean values are given as mean ± standard deviation. All individual and familial parameters were analyzed for significant risk factors associated with VD. Chi-square test and Student’s t-test were performed to assess the differences in children with VD for categorical and continuous variables. A univariate regression analysis was performed to determine the independent factors correlating with VD. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The study population consisted of 3.015 children with a mean age of 10.2±2.2 years (range: 7-14 years). 6% (1.387) of subjects were boys and 54% (1.628) were girls. The response rate was 67.3%. Incomplete questionnaires were not assessed.
The prevalence of VD, NE, and monosymptomatic NE was found to be 6.6% (199), 6.1% (185), and 2.6% (78), respectively. The highest incidences of VD (13.1%), NE (14.5%), and monosymptomatic NE (5.9%) were found at age seven years. The frequency of all the three conditions tended to decrease with age (Figure 2 and Table 1).
No statistically significant difference was found in terms of age, gender, or fluid intake between children with and without VD (Figure 3). As per demographic data, we found no significant difference in school type (government or private) or parents’ education level but found statistically significant differences in the overall number of siblings (p=0.040) and family income (p=0.006). The subgroup analysis of parents’ education level revealed that compared to the children of mothers in other subgroups, children of the university graduate mothers had lower rates of VD (p=0.002) (Table 2).
The overall rate of constipation was 9.6% (n=289); the rate was 19.7% (n=57) in children with VD and was statistically significant (p<0.001). The overall rate of fecal soiling was 5.5% (n=165); the rate was 26.6% (n=53) in children with VD and was statistically significant (p<0.001). Children with any congenital urinary anomaly had a significantly high VD rate (25.8%), and children with any behavioral or psychological problem (20.7%) or learning disability (14.7%) had significantly high VD compared with children without such problems (Table 3). Family income and VD were inversely correlated, and children from low-income families had significantly higher VD rates than those from middle- (p=0.0039) and high-income (p=0.030) families (Table 2).
Univariate regression analysis did not reveal any statistically significant factor contributing to VD. However, multivariate analysis revealed a significant difference between VD‑positive and -negative children when regarded as jointly on the variables of age and sibling number; Wilk’s L=0.974, F (2, 3045)=40.2, p=0.000, partial h2=0.026. A separate ANOVA was performed for each dependent variable, with each ANOVA assessed at an alpha level of 0.025. A significant difference was found between VD‑positive and -negative children regarding age, F (1, 3046)=80.5, p=0.000, partial h2=0.026, with VD‑negative patients (M=10.3) scoring lower than VD‑positive patients (M=8.9). No significant difference was found between VD‑positive and ‑negative children regarding sibling number, F (1, 3046)=3.8, p=0.051, partial h2=0.001.
Discussion
In our study, the response rate was 67.5%, which was significantly lower than that in studies by Yüksel et al. (15) (86%) and Bolat et al. (16) (91.9%). Incompletely answered questionnaires were not assessed, acknowledging that socioeconomic levels may be a factor for not completing questionnaires.
The overall frequency of VD was 6.6% in primary school children, compared with 9.3% in the study by Yüksel et al. (15), which was the first reported study evaluating VD with the DVSS questionnaire in an epidemiologic setting in an Anatolian city. Vaz et al. (17) reported a frequency of 21.8% for VD with a modified DVSS questionnaire in 739 healthy school-age Brazilian children. The population in both studies was younger than the population in our study, and the high rate of VD may be associated with rather low socioeconomic levels. However, our study population was urban.
The prevalence of daytime UI in children has been reported to be 4.4% to 19.2% and 2.1% to 6.3% in different European and Asian countries, respectively (18,19,20,21,22). Previous studies have reported prevalence rates between 0.5% and 8% in different Turkish cities (16,23,24,25,26,27). In our study, the overall daytime UI prevalence was 6.1%, which was in accordance with the overall NE rate and similar to the results of previous studies. However, most of these studies did not use a validated symptom score system, except for the study by Bolat et al. (16).
Mota et al. (28) reported a VD rate of 24.2% by using the scoring system of Farhat et al. (12)., Chung et al. (29) reported a VD rate of 46.4% with a different survey. Yüksel et al. (15) reported that if responders answered only the first question “Does your child have UI during daytime?” as a description of VD in the DVSS questionnaire, the VD rate was 25.4%. The authors concluded that only one question was sometimes related to an overestimation of frequency. By contrast, in our study, the frequency of VD was nearly the same. For previous studies reporting higher rates, the questionnaires may not have been validated in their country or region.
In this study, no difference in VD was found in the children with regard to age, gender, fluid intake, school type (government and private), or parents’ overall education level. Yüksel et al. (15) reported that the prevalence of VD was significantly higher in girls than that in boys only in the age group of 12 to 15 years; in our study, girls had a higher frequency of VD than boys did but this difference was not statistically significant (Figure 3).
In our study, overall education level of the parents did not affect VD rates, but in the subgroup analysis, children of university graduate mothers had statistically lower VD rates than children of non-university graduate mothers (p<0.05). This difference was obvious in the study by Yüksel et al. (15). This difference may be related to the mothers’ ability to teach or perform voiding training and mothers’ close relationship with children for positive outcomes of VD. Another study reported that the degree of parental education level was inversely correlated with the prevalence of VD (29). Another study reported no statistically significant difference in parental education and VD in children (19).
Many reports have emphasized the association between NE and having more siblings but the association between VD and having more siblings has been considered less frequently (30,31). A study from Turkiye reported that risk factors for VD were having four or more siblings and having two or more persons per bedroom (15). Although we found a statistically significant difference in the overall number of siblings (p<0.05), the difference was not significant in the subgroup analysis.
In our study, the prevalence of VD was higher in children from low-income families than in those from middle- (p<0.01) and high-income families (p<0.05), in agreement with previous studies that evaluated NE and VD (10,16,32). Parents of with high income mostly had a high education level, therefore, this could be an advantage for voiding training and supporting children.
The total frequency of UTI history was 15% in this study. The children with a history of UTI had a significantly higher prevalence of VD than children without (p<0.01). Although we could not prove this association by using an objective tool or test, such as urine culture, in our questionnaire, the previous studies have supported the association between VD and UTI (15,33).
According to previous studies, voiding positions and habits affect the voiding functions in children, especially in girls (34,35). In our study, children who had abnormal voiding positions had a higher prevalence of VD (p<0.01) than those who did not. We only asked parents about the existence of abnormal voiding positions, but a previous study used some pictures of abnormal voiding position to better explain the question (15). This approach might be more beneficial for patient understanding.
Constipation and bowel distension may affect the bladder and cause detrusor hyperactivity and UI (36). In our study, the prevalence of constipation and fecal soiling was significantly higher in children with VD. Many studies have reported higher prevalence rates of UI in children with constipation (15,16,17,21,37,38). In our study, as per univariate regression analysis, constipation was not a significant contributing factor.
Our study results showed that the prevalence of behavioral or psychological problems and learning disabilities were significantly higher in children with VD, which was also reported in previous studies (39,40). Particularly, inattentive presentation of attention‑deficit hyperactivity disorder was demonstrated in children with monosymptomatic NE and nocturnal polyuria. According to teachers, the frequency of urination and a small voided volume might cause more attention problems and a high number of nights with nocturnal polyuria correlated with behavioral problems (40). Treatment of VD or monosymptomatic NE could have positive effects on taking care of behavioral or psychological problems and learning disabilities in children.
According to our study results, children with VD or NE did not seek any treatment or medical counseling before the study. Some myths about the treatment of NE in Anatolia may be a cause for parents’ ignorance of VD and NE.
Study Limitations
Our study had some limitations. The questionnaires were not completed in an interview. We did not enquire about parents’ voiding habits during their childhood, so we could not investigate the association between VD in children and VD in parents’ childhood. In addition, we could not confirm the diagnosis of VD obtained from our questionnaire and the DVSS questionnaire by accurate clinical evaluation. Finally, we gave cursory information to teachers about VD and NE in children to guide children with VD and NE.
Conclusion
Our study shows comparable results of the prevalence of VD and NE in primary school children in an Anatolian city by using the DVSS questionnaire. VD has a high incidence in early childhood but children can spontaneously recover with age. However, children who have any behavioral or psychological problems and learning disabilities have significantly higher VD rates.